Three Men Charged in Clermont County Shooting
Errick L. Davis, Daviyon R. Lunsford, and Daveon Stillwell face charges stemming from an August 2026 shooting.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 7, 2026, 10:12 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 7, 2026, 10:25 p.m. ET
Three Men Charged in Clermont County Shooting
Errick L. Davis, Daviyon R. Lunsford, and Daveon Stillwell have been charged in connection with an August 21, 2026 shooting in Clermont County, according to clermontsun.com. The charges include attempted murder, felonious assault, discharging a firearm on or near prohibited premises, having weapons under disability, and obstructing justice. The case is at the charging stage, and no trial has occurred; the defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Sentencing has not been scheduled; the statutory maximum is 78 to 83.5 years in prison, clermontsun.com reported.
The charges stem from allegations that the three men, driving a black BMW, fired multiple shots at a vehicle occupied by juveniles, with Davis firing the shots, according to clermontsun.com. The Clermont County Sheriff's Office investigated the case.
Sep 7, 2026, 10:12 p.m. ETFirst report
Three Hamilton County Men Charged in Clermont County Shooting; Case Undecided
Three Hamilton County men have been charged with attempted murder and other offenses in connection with an August 21, 2026 shooting in Clermont County, according to the Clermont Sun. The case is only at the charging stage and remains undecided.
Errick L. Davis, Daviyon R. Lunsford, and Daveon Stillwell are charged with attempted murder, felonious assault, discharging a firearm on or near a prohibited premises, having weapons under disability, and obstructing justice, the outlet reported.
The government alleges that on August 21, 2026, the defendants, driving a black BMW, fired multiple shots at a vehicle occupied by juveniles, with Davis firing the shots, according to the Clermont Sun.
The case is being investigated by the Clermont County Sheriff's Office. The charges are allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Because the matter is only at the charging stage, it has not been decided by a court. The statutory maximum sentence is 78 to 83.5 years in prison, the outlet reported.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 02:25current
First published.
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 02:12current
First published.
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 02:54current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.