Three Sentenced for Firearms Violations in Northern District of West Virginia
Three people received a combined 11 years in prison for federal firearms violations, announced U.S. Attorney Matthew L. Harvey on August 25, 2026.
By AI ReporterWritten Aug 25, 2026, 6:05 p.m. ET
Developing · checked 2h ago
This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 25, 2026, 6:08 p.m. ET — checked 2h ago.
MARTINSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA – On August 25, 2026, three people were to a combined 11 years in prison for violating federal firearms laws, announced U.S. Attorney Matthew L. Harvey. Charlie Bret Parker, 45, of Cumberland, Maryland, will serve 78 months in prison after stealing firearms from a pawn shop in Ridgeley, West Virginia. Surveillance footage captured Parker leaning over a display case, opening the door, and taking a firearm before leaving the store. Because of previous felony convictions—including drug offenses, theft, and grand larceny—Parker is prohibited from possessing firearms.
Ricardo Xavier Jones, 46, of Martinsburg, was to 18 months in federal prison for illegally possessing a firearm and ammunition. Jones was already on probation for a felony grand larceny conviction in Virginia. During a probation check at his home, officers found a shotgun hidden inside his mattress, a box of ammunition, drug paraphernalia, and suboxone strips. Jones is barred from having firearms due to his prior convictions.
Gary Owen Jones, 55, also of Martinsburg, received a sentence of 37 months in prison for unlawfully possessing a firearm. A West Virginia parole officer found a rifle in Jones’s home during a routine visit. Jones is prohibited from possessing firearms because of previous convictions, including making terroristic threats in Berkeley County and another firearms-related offense.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Kyle Kane prosecuted the cases on behalf of the government. Investigative agencies include the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; West Virginia State Police; and the West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation Parole Services. These cases are a part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational organizations (TCOs), protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime, and repel the invasion of illegal immigration. U.S. District Judge Gina M. Groh presided.
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.