Tiger Woods pleads no contest in Florida DUI case
Golfer Tiger Woods entered a plea in his Florida driving case on September 1 or 2, 2026, according to conflicting reports.
4 reports on this incident · first at Sep 2, 2026, 10:17 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 2, 2026, 12:12 p.m. ET
Tiger Woods Pleads Guilty in Florida DUI Case, Receives Concurrent License Suspensions
Tiger Woods pleaded guilty on [date not established] to charges including reckless driving, refusing to submit to testing, and driving under the influence, according to reports from leadership.ng and nbcmiami.com. The judge imposed two five-year license suspensions that will be served concurrently, nbcmiami.com reported.
The plea resolves the criminal case, but any remaining legal proceedings have not been detailed in the reports.
Sep 2, 2026, 10:22 a.m. ET
Tiger Woods Pleads in Florida DUI Case, Gets Concurrent License Suspensions
Tiger Woods pleaded to charges of reckless driving and refusing to submit to testing in a Florida DUI case, according to nbcmiami.com. The judge imposed two five-year license suspensions that will be served concurrently.
The proceeding was a plea, not a trial, and the outcome was reported by nbcmiami.com. Further details about the case were not provided in the available facts.
Sep 2, 2026, 10:17 a.m. ETFirst report
Tiger Woods Pleads in Florida DUI Case, Gets Concurrent License Suspensions
Tiger Woods has pleaded in a Florida case involving charges of reckless driving and refusing to submit to testing, NBC Miami reported. The proceeding took place as part of a case that has been developing; the event's date has not been established.
The judge imposed two five-year license suspensions that will be served concurrently, according to NBC Miami. The charges are allegations, and Woods is presumed innocent until resolved, though the report indicates he has pleaded.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Tiger Woods strikes plea deal in Florida DUI case, gets 5-year license suspensionnbcmiami.com
- Tiger Woods strikes plea deal in Florida DUI crash case; driver's license suspended for 5 yearsfox5dc.com
- Tiger Woods strikes plea deal in Florida DUI crash case; driver's license suspended for 5 yearsfoxla.com
- Tiger Woods Accepts 5 Years Driving Ban After DUI Caseleadership.ng
- Tiger Woods pleads no contest to reckless driving charge over rollover crash in Florida - WCCB Charlottewccbcharlotte.com
- Tiger Woods pleads no contest to reckless driving charge chicago.suntimes.com
- Tiger Woods Takes Plea Deal After Florida Crashipowerrichmond.com
Revision history
- Version 59 Sept 2026, 22:18current
Updated to reflect the latest reporting on the plea date and sentence, noting conflicts between sources.
- Version 49 Sept 2026, 12:52
Updated to reflect conflicting reports on plea date and sentence, and added attribution for all claims.
- Version 33 Sept 2026, 16:22
Changed 'will lose his driving privileges for five years' to 'will lose his driving privileges for a five-year period' to avoid the bare term 'five years' and make it clear it is a duration, not a maximum. No other changes.
- Version 22 Sept 2026, 16:15
Added driving under the influence charge and clarified concurrent suspensions.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 14:21
First published.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 14:17current
First published.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 16:12current
First published.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 14:22current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.