Tiger Woods Pleads in Florida DUI Case, Gets Concurrent License Suspensions
Tiger Woods pleaded to reckless driving and refusing to submit to testing, receiving two five-year license suspensions to run concurrently.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 2, 2026, 10:17 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 2, 2026, 10:21 a.m. ET
Tiger Woods Pleads in Florida DUI Case, Gets Concurrent License Suspensions
Tiger Woods pleaded in his Florida DUI case on charges of reckless driving and refusing to submit to testing, NBC Miami reported. The judge imposed two five-year license suspensions that will be served concurrently, according to the report.
The charges stem from an incident that led to his arrest. Further details of the plea and the underlying case were not provided in the report.
Sep 2, 2026, 10:17 a.m. ETFirst report
Tiger Woods Pleads in Florida DUI Case, Gets Concurrent License Suspensions
Tiger Woods has pleaded in a Florida case involving charges of reckless driving and refusing to submit to testing, NBC Miami reported. The proceeding took place as part of a case that has been developing; the event's date has not been established.
The judge imposed two five-year license suspensions that will be served concurrently, according to NBC Miami. The charges are allegations, and Woods is presumed innocent until resolved, though the report indicates he has pleaded.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 14:22current
First published.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 14:17current
First published.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 14:21current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.