Two Brothers Charged in Armed Robbery of Fargo Poker Game
Jackson James Dubois and Delton Robledo Dubois face felony charges in connection with a gunpoint robbery; the case is undecided.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 2, 2026, 5:52 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 2, 2026, 5:52 p.m. ETFirst report
Two brothers charged in armed robbery of Fargo poker game
Two brothers have been charged in connection with an armed robbery of a private poker game in Fargo, according to Valley News Live. Jackson James Dubois, 22, of Fargo, and Delton Robledo Dubois, 20, of West Fargo, are charged with robbery involving a firearm, dangerous weapon, or destructive device, a Class B felony, the outlet reported.
The government alleges the brothers helped orchestrate the robbery, in which six men were held at gunpoint by masked gunmen. The case is pending in Cass County District Court. As of the latest reports, the charges are allegations, and the brothers are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The matter is only at the charging stage, and the case has not been decided by a court.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 21:52current
First published.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 21:52current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.