FirstAlerts
Crime & Courts

Two Sentenced to Federal Prison for Distribution of Fentanyl

A Pensacola man and woman received prison terms for drug distribution charges, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 1, 2026, 10:31 p.m. ET
Developing · checked 36 min ago

This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Sep 1, 2026, 11:08 p.m. ET — checked 36 min ago.

Two people were to federal prison for drug distribution charges, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Florida announced on September 1, 2026. Adrian Dion Pettaway Jr., 25, of Pensacola, was to 28 months for distribution of fentanyl. Gindy Nicole Lacey, 49, of Pensacola, was to 60 months for distribution of methamphetamine, tramadol, and fentanyl. Court records show that in November 2024, Lacey sold tramadol pills and methamphetamine to an undercover officer, and in December 2024, she sold 1,000 pills containing fentanyl during an undercover operation. The investigation revealed that Pettaway had supplied Lacey with the fentanyl pills. Lacey was previously convicted of armed bank robbery and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence. The case was investigated by Homeland Security Investigations, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey M. Tharp. It is part of Operation Take Back America, a Department of Justice initiative.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 12 Sept 2026, 02:31current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.