Two sentencings reported on Aug. 13, 2026; outlets' accounts differ on defendant, conduct and term
Three South Carolina outlets report a 15-year federal sentence for Derrick Gathers over the 2023 shooting of a state trooper, while WCBM reports an 85-year sentence for a defendant in the Morgan State University mass shooting.
4 reports on this incident · first at Aug 12, 2026, 11:24 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 12, 2026, 11:52 p.m. ET
D.C. Man Sentenced to 85 Years in Morgan State University Shooting Case
Marquis Brown, 20, of Washington D.C., has been sentenced to 85 years in prison in connection with the 2023 mass shooting at Morgan State University, WCBM reported. The outlet reported he faced five counts of attempted second-degree murder and related offenses, which carried up to 259 years in prison.
Prosecutors say Brown was involved in the shooting on the night of Oct. 3, 2023, in which five people, including four students, were shot on the university's campus, according to WCBM.
A second suspect, Javon "Chewy" Williams, also of Washington D.C., was indicted over the on-campus attack and was linked to the shooting by Baltimore Police, officials said, according to WCBM. The outlet's report does not say what stage the case against Williams has reached.
Aug 12, 2026, 11:34 p.m. ET
D.C. Man Sentenced to 85 Years in Morgan State University Shooting Case
Marquis Brown, 20, of Washington D.C., has been sentenced to 85 years in prison in connection with the 2023 mass shooting at Morgan State University, WCBM reported. The charges in the case were five counts of attempted second-degree murder and related offenses, according to the outlet, which reported that the counts carried a maximum of up to 259 years in prison.
Prosecutors say Brown was involved in the shooting on the night of Oct. 3, 2023, in which five people, including four students, were shot on campus, WCBM reported.
A second suspect, Javon "Chewy" Williams, of Washington D.C., was indicted over the on-campus attack and was linked to the shooting by Baltimore Police, officials said, according to WCBM. The report does not say how far the case against Williams has progressed since his indictment.
Aug 12, 2026, 11:24 p.m. ETFirst report
D.C. Man Sentenced to 85 Years in Morgan State University Mass Shooting
Marquis Brown, 20, of Washington D.C., has been sentenced to 85 years in prison in connection with the mass shooting at Morgan State University, according to WCBM. The outlet reported he faced five counts of attempted second-degree murder and related offenses, which carried a statutory maximum of up to 259 years in prison.
Prosecutors say Brown was involved in the 2023 shooting on the university's campus, in which five people, including four students, were shot on the night of Oct. 3, 2023, WCBM reported.
A second suspect, Javon "Chewy" Williams, also of Washington D.C., was indicted over the on-campus attack and was linked to the shooting by Baltimore Police, officials said, according to WCBM. The status of proceedings against Williams was not detailed in the available reporting.
This account is drawn from a single outlet's report and the matter remains developing; further details, including the date of sentencing, were not stated.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- D.C. man sentenced to 85 years in prison for Morgan State University mass shootingwcbm.com
- Georgia man sentenced to 15 years in federal prison after 2023 shooting of S.C. state trooperfoxcarolina.com
- Georgia man sentenced to additional prison time after shooting SC state trooper in 2023southcarolinapublicradio.org
- Georgia man sentenced to 15 years in federal prison after 2023 shooting of S.C. state trooperwistv.com
Revision history
- Version 314 Aug 2026, 00:23current
Added Fox Carolina and South Carolina Public Radio accounts of the Gathers sentencing (38-year state sentence, Bamberg County 3:30 a.m. speeding stop, 11-minute pursuit ending in a crash into a home's yard, second charge) and the Aug. 13, 2026 announcement date; restructured to lead with the corroborated South Carolina case.
- Version 214 Aug 2026, 00:15
Removed the phrase "facts on the record" from the closing paragraph and rewrote that paragraph in reader-facing language, keeping the caveat that the two accounts cannot be reconciled. Restated both conflicting sentence figures and both conflicting statutory maximums with attribution, printing them exactly as sourced (15 years (180 months), 80 months consecutive, 100 months concurrent, three-year supervised release; 85 years; up to 259 years in prison). No facts added or attribution dropped.
- Version 113 Aug 2026, 03:34current
First published.
- Version 113 Aug 2026, 03:24current
First published.
- Version 113 Aug 2026, 03:52current
First published.
- Version 113 Aug 2026, 03:28
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.