FirstAlerts

Valley City Woman Charged After Stolen Firearm, Meth Found During Search

Dawn Marie Andracki faces multiple felony charges following an investigation by Valley City police. The case remains undecided.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 20, 2026, 6:10 p.m. ETWritten Aug 20, 2026, 6:34 p.m. ET
A Valley City woman has been after police say they found a stolen firearm and methamphetamine during a search of her residence. Dawn Marie Andracki, 59, faces charges of possession of a firearm by a felon, possession of methamphetamine (second or subsequent offense), possession of drug paraphernalia (second or subsequent offense), and possession of stolen property, according to Valley News Live. The government alleges Andracki broke into a Jeep and stole $4,000 in cash along with a firearm, and that during a search of her residence officers found a stolen firearm and methamphetamine. The Valley City Police Department is the investigating agency. The case is at the charging stage and has not been resolved. Andracki has not been tried, and no verdict has been reached. The charges are allegations, and she is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 120 Aug 2026, 22:34current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.