Washington County Man Sentenced to 8 Years for Wire Fraud and Money Laundering
Stanley Pophal was sentenced to 96 months in federal prison after pleading guilty to wire fraud and money laundering.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 4, 2026, 4:22 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 4, 2026, 4:22 p.m. ETFirst report
Washington County Man Sentenced to 15 Years for Wire Fraud
A Southern Utah man was sentenced to 180 months’ imprisonment after posing as a ‘savant’ stock trader, obtaining at least $89 million from approximately 200 investors, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Utah. The sentence was imposed by U.S. District Court Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen on September 3, 2026, following Perkins’s guilty plea on February 2, 2026, to wire fraud.
Perkins, 47, of Washington City, Utah, was also sentenced to three years of supervised release and ordered to pay $77,683,091.96 in restitution. Court documents state that between August 2023 and November 2025, Perkins operated Forged Oak LLC and established a business arrangement with the principal of RentDue Capital LLC, which recruited investors through social media and other means. Perkins made false representations about fund performance, including providing altered brokerage statements. In early November 2025, he provided a statement representing over $133 million in the funds, when they had less than $13 million.
Perkins lost tens of millions of dollars in day trading and misappropriated funds for personal expenses, including a down payment on a home, a cabin, luxury vehicles, an airplane, and an $80,000 hunt in British Columbia. U.S. Attorney Melissa Holyoak said, “Perkins’s elaborate scheme left a slew of victims in his wake.” FBI Special Agent in Charge Robert Bohls stated, “Perkins financed a lavish lifestyle by stealing from his victims.” The case was investigated by the FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, and the Utah Division of Securities.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 14 Sept 2026, 20:22current
First published.
- Version 19 Sept 2026, 21:22current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.