FirstAlerts

Waubay Man Sentenced to 20 Months for Assault with Dangerous Weapon

Dawson Roger Locke, 19, of Waubay, South Dakota, was sentenced to 20 months in federal prison for shooting another young adult in the leg.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 27, 2026, 6:00 a.m. ETWritten Aug 28, 2026, 7:06 p.m. ET
Developing · not yet checked for updates

This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.

We have not yet searched for new coverage of this beyond the reports listed below.

Dawson Roger Locke, 19, of Waubay, South Dakota, was to 20 months in federal prison, followed by three years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office. The sentence was handed down for assault with a dangerous weapon, as reported by DRG News. Locke shot another young adult with a handgun after an argument, firing three shots and hitting the victim in the leg, according to DRG News. The FBI and Sisseton-Wahpeton Tribal Police investigated the case. The sentencing occurred on August 27, 2026, according to the report.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 128 Aug 2026, 23:06current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.