FirstAlerts

West Virginia Man Charged With Felon in Possession of a Firearm After Highland Park Arrest

Kasey Rhyan Stewart, 31, faces one felony count after police say they found the gun he had allegedly been carrying; the case is at the charging stage and undecided.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Sep 11, 2026, 9:23 a.m. ETWritten Sep 11, 2026, 10:22 a.m. ET
Kasey Rhyan Stewart, 31, has been with being a felon in possession of a firearm, a felony, theintermountain.com reported. The charge is an allegation, the case is at the charging stage, and it has not been resolved; Stewart is presumed innocent. The government alleges that Stewart, a felon, possessed a firearm, according to theintermountain.com. Police arrested him after he had been reported with a firearm in the Highland Park area and then found the gun he had allegedly carrying, the outlet reported. The Randolph County Sheriff's Office, the Elkins Police Department, the West Virginia State Police Elkins Detachment and Randolph County EMS were involved, according to theintermountain.com. The case is developing and no further details have been established.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 111 Sept 2026, 14:22current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.