West Virginia Man Charged With Threatening Mayor and President Trump
Christopher Benjamin Curtis faces charges in Randolph County Magistrate Court over alleged threats against the mayor and President Trump; the case is undecided.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 5, 2026, 3:42 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 5, 2026, 3:42 a.m. ETFirst report
West Virginia Man Charged With Threatening Mayor and President Trump
A 44-year-old man has been charged with threats of terroristic acts in Randolph County Magistrate Court, according to The Inter-Mountain. The charges stem from allegations that Christopher Benjamin "Ben" Curtis threatened the mayor and President Donald Trump, including grabbing a pipe wrench and acting like he was splitting the president's head, and calling the mayor 'a marked man.' The government's claims were reported by The Inter-Mountain.
The case is being investigated by the Randolph County Sheriff's Office and the Elkins City Police, the newspaper reported. Curtis has been charged but not tried; charges are allegations and he is presumed innocent. The matter is undecided and has not been resolved. The case is still developing, and the date of the alleged conduct has not been established.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Terroristic threats case going to grand jurytheintermountain.com
Revision history
- Version 15 Sept 2026, 07:52current
First published.
- Version 15 Sept 2026, 07:42current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.