Wimborne man convicted of assaulting partner
Nicholas Moore, 52, was found guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm following an incident in which he allegedly refused to leave a property and took control of the victim's phone.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 8, 2026, 10:21 a.m. ET
This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Sep 8, 2026, 10:40 a.m. ET — checked 32 min ago.
Earlier reports
Sep 8, 2026, 10:21 a.m. ETFirst report
Wimborne man convicted of assaulting partner
Nicholas Moore, 52, of St Catherines in Wimborne Minster, has been convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, according to the Bournemouth Echo.
The court heard that Moore assaulted the victim after refusing to leave the property when asked, and also took control of her phone and denied her access to it, the newspaper reported. The case was investigated by Wiltshire Police.
The conviction was reported on September 8, 2026. Further details, including sentencing, have not been disclosed in the available reports.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Abuser convicted of 'absolutely shocking' assault of partner in Wiltshirebournemouthecho.co.uk
Revision history
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 14:22current
First published.
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 14:21current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.