Woman Charged, Not Convicted, in Fatal Shooting at Wilkes-Barre Hookah Lounge
Natasha Mary Dixon, 36, faces a criminal homicide charge in the shooting death of Ayana Shanell Velardo; the case is undecided and she is presumed innocent.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 6, 2026, 3:57 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 6, 2026, 3:57 p.m. ETFirst report
Woman Charged in Fatal Shooting at Wilkes-Barre Hookah Lounge
A 36-year-old woman has been charged in connection with a fatal shooting in Wilkes-Barre, according to the Times Leader.
Natasha Mary Dixon is charged with criminal homicide in the death of Ayana Shanell Velardo. Police allege Dixon shot Velardo in the neck after a dispute inside a hookah lounge, the Times Leader reported.
The case is in Luzerne County. Wilkes-Barre City police are investigating.
Dixon has been charged but not tried; charges are allegations and she is presumed innocent.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Plea negotiations underway in Wilkes-Barre fatal shootingtimesleader.com
Revision history
- Version 16 Sept 2026, 20:00current
First published.
- Version 16 Sept 2026, 19:57current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.