FirstAlerts

Magnitude 7.4 Earthquake Strikes Cali, Colombia

The earthquake was reported by israelnationalnews.com; the location has been given as Cali, Colombia, in some reports and simply as Cali in others.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 21, 2026, 10:30 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 14, 2026, 3:28 p.m. ETUpdated Aug 29, 2026, 2:51 p.m. ET
A magnitude 7.4 struck , according to israelnationalnews.com. The location has been given as , in some reports and simply as in others, according to the same outlet. The cause of the has not been determined.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 21, 2026, 10:30 a.m. ETFirst report

    Earthquake Strikes Cali, Colombia

    An earthquake has been reported in Cali, Colombia, according to Israel National News. The report did not provide details on the magnitude, timing, or any damage or casualties.

    The event is still developing, and further information has not yet been released.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 229 Aug 2026, 18:51current

    Updated to reflect the revised magnitude of 7.4 and clarified the location conflict.

  2. Version 121 Aug 2026, 14:30current

    First published.

  3. Version 129 Aug 2026, 18:46

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.