FirstAlerts

Magnitude 7.7 Earthquake Strikes East Nusa Tenggara; 86 Felt Reports

A magnitude 7.7 earthquake hit East Nusa Tenggara, with 86 felt reports, according to Antara News.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 23, 2026, 11:44 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 19, 2026, 12:14 p.m. ETWritten Aug 23, 2026, 11:52 p.m. ET
Developing · checked 3h ago

Earthquake records are revised. Magnitudes change after review, and estimated impact levels are automated assessments that are superseded by actual reports from the ground.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 24, 2026, 12:10 a.m. ET — checked 3h ago.

A magnitude 7.7 struck on August 15, 2026, according to Antara News. The agency reported 86 felt reports from the event. The 's magnitude was initially reported as 7.7, and this figure has been revised after review. The cause of the has not been determined.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 23, 2026, 11:44 p.m. ETFirst report

    Magnitude 7.7 Earthquake Strikes East Nusa Tenggara; 86 Felt Reports

    A magnitude 7.7 earthquake struck East Nusa Tenggara (NTT) on August 15, 2026, according to Antara News. The agency reported 86 felt reports from the event.

    The earthquake's impact is still being assessed, and the situation is developing. Further details have not been confirmed by authorities at this time.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 124 Aug 2026, 03:44current

    First published.

  2. Version 124 Aug 2026, 03:52current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.