Magnitude 7.7 Earthquake Strikes Flores Region, NTT
A magnitude 7.7 earthquake hit the Flores region of East Nusa Tenggara on August 15, 2026, with sources differing on the exact time and location.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 24, 2026, 2:46 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 24, 2026, 2:46 a.m. ETFirst report
Magnitude 7.7 Earthquake Strikes Sikka District, East Nusa Tenggara
A magnitude 7.7 earthquake has struck Sikka District, East Nusa Tenggara Province, according to a report from Antara News. The report, published on August 24, 2026, did not provide details on casualties or damage.
The earthquake's impact and any resulting damage are still being assessed. The cause of the earthquake is natural seismic activity, but further details have not been released.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- BNPB prepares housing aid for Flores earthquake survivorsen.antaranews.com
- Roads top priority in Flores earthquake recovery: ministeren.antaranews.com
- Why Did Prabowo Wait 11 Days to Visit Earthquake-Hit Flores?en.tempo.co
- Prabowo Breaks Silence on Delayed NTT Earthquake Visiten.tempo.co
- NTT transport repairs expedited following Flores quake, minister saysen.antaranews.com
Revision history
- Version 326 Aug 2026, 17:27current
Updated to reflect conflicting reports on time and location, and added depth.
- Version 226 Aug 2026, 17:20
Updated to reflect the revised magnitude and the conflicting location reports.
- Version 124 Aug 2026, 06:46current
First published.
- Version 124 Aug 2026, 06:51
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.