Ralph Lauren CPO Halide Alagoz Sells $2.6M in Company Stock
An SEC Form 4 filing shows the chief product and merchandising officer sold 2,398 shares at $402.77 each.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 18, 2026, 8:22 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 18, 2026, 8:22 a.m. ETFirst report
Ralph Lauren Executive Halide Alagoz Sells $2.64 Million in Stock
According to an official SEC Form 4 insider transaction filing, Halide Alagoz, Chief Product & Merch. Officer of Ralph Lauren Corp (ticker: RL), sold 6,559 shares of common stock on August 10, 2026.
The filing records that the shares were sold at $402.77 per share, totaling $2,641,768. Following the transaction, Alagoz held 18,851 shares. The filing indicates the transaction was not made under a trading plan.
Official records list both Ralph Lauren Corp and Alagoz in New York, NY.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 323 Aug 2026, 10:14current
Corrected the number of shares sold from 6,559 to 2,398 and the transaction date from Aug. 10 to Aug. 15, per the official filing.
- Version 318 Aug 2026, 12:22current
Added headline, dek, and source citation URL.
- Version 217 Aug 2026, 14:15
Corrected the name order of insider Halide Alagoz and added a headline and dek.
- Version 217 Aug 2026, 14:19
Reformatted report to align with official document tier attribution standards.
- Version 115 Aug 2026, 15:56
First published.
- Version 115 Aug 2026, 15:28
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.