AXIA Energia Director Pedro Batista de Lima Filho Sells 414,200 Shares
A director of AXIA Energia S.A. has filed a Form 4 disclosing a sale of common stock.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 2, 2026, 10:16 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 2, 2026, 10:16 p.m. ETFirst report
AXIA Energia Director Sells 414,200 Shares
A Form 4 insider transaction filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reports that Pedro Batista de Lima Filho, a director of AXIA Energia S.A. (ticker: AXIA3), sold 414,200 shares of common stock on August 31, 2026. The shares were sold at a price of $10.28 per share, for a total transaction value of $4,257,976, according to the filing. After the sale, the director held 13,330,819 shares. The filing indicates the transaction was not made under a trading plan.
The filing lists the company's address in Rio de Janeiro and identifies the insider's city as Rio de Janeiro. The transaction is recorded in an SEC filing dated for the event.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 02:22current
First published.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 02:16current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.