FirstAlerts

Bloom Energy Director John T. Chambers Reports $3.75 Million Stock Sale

A Form 4 insider transaction report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission records the sale of 15,000 Bloom Energy shares on August 13, 2026, under a pre-arranged trading plan.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 15, 2026, 10:27 a.m. ET
Developing

Form 4 reports a single transaction on a single day. An insider may file again, and a sale under a pre-arranged plan is one of a scheduled series rather than a decision taken that week.

More on this incident

A report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission records that John T. Chambers, listed in the filing as a of , sold common stock in the company on August 13, 2026. According to the filing, the transaction covered 15,000 shares at a price of $ per share, for a reported amount of $3,750,000. The filing lists 208,333 shares held following the transaction. The form indicates the sale was made under a trading plan. The filing lists , which trades under the ticker BE, at , California, and gives , California as the address for the reporting insider. The filing is a disclosure record and contains no explanation of the reasons for the transaction. This account is based solely on the document on file with the SEC; further details may emerge as the record is reviewed.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 115 Aug 2026, 14:28current

    First published.

  2. Version 115 Aug 2026, 14:27current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.