Aehr Test Systems CEO Gayn Erickson Discloses $5.03 Million Stock Sale
President and CEO Gayn Erickson sold 38,452 shares according to an SEC Form 4 filing.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 18, 2026, 8:23 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 18, 2026, 8:23 a.m. ETFirst report
Aehr Test Systems CEO Gayn Erickson Sells $5.03 Million in Stock
Gayn Erickson, President and CEO of AEHR TEST SYSTEMS, sold 38,452 shares of common stock on August 12, 2026, according to an SEC Form 4 insider transaction filing. The stock was sold at a price of $130.7856 per share, for a total value of $5,028,968.
Following the sale, Erickson holds 157,723 shares in the company. According to the official filing, the transaction was not conducted under a trading plan.
Both AEHR TEST SYSTEMS, which trades under ticker symbol AEHR, and Erickson are based in Fremont, California.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 318 Aug 2026, 12:23current
Formatted report into headline, dek, and structured body paragraphs.
- Version 217 Aug 2026, 14:20
Updated story text to correct insider name order and added source URL to citations.
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 12:24current
First published.
- Version 114 Aug 2026, 21:14
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.