FirstAlerts

Astera Labs CEO Jitendra Mohan Sells $20,948,826 in Common Stock, SEC Record Shows

According to an official SEC filing, Astera Labs Chief Executive Officer Jitendra Mohan sold 61,821 shares of common stock on August 17, 2026.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 20, 2026, 12:22 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 20, 2026, 12:52 a.m. ET
According to an official SEC filing, () sold 61,821 shares of common stock on August 17, 2026. The sale totaled $20,948,826, with shares sold at a price of $ per share. The official record shows that the transaction was not executed under a trading plan. Following the sale, Mohan holds 1,329,229 shares in the , California-based company.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 20, 2026, 12:22 a.m. ETFirst report

    Astera Labs CEO Jitendra Mohan Sells $20,948,826 in Common Stock, SEC Record Shows

    According to an official SEC Form 4 insider transaction filing, Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) Chief Executive Officer Jitendra Mohan sold 61,821 shares of common stock on August 17, 2026. The sale of common stock totaled $20,948,826, executed at a price of $344.9944 per share. Official records state the transaction was not executed under a trading plan. Both Astera Labs, Inc. and Mohan are located in San Jose, CA. Following the transaction, Mohan holds 1,329,229 shares.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 120 Aug 2026, 04:52current

    First published.

  2. Version 120 Aug 2026, 04:22current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.