FirstAlerts

New York Market on North Lake Shore Drive failed its Chicago inspection, then passed a re-inspection a week later

The Chicago inspection record shows the establishment at 3660 N Lake Shore Dr failed on Aug. 28, 2026, with a pest control log violation cited, and passed on Sept. 4, 2026.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 10, 2026, 5:54 a.m. ET
, at in , on Aug. 28, 2026, according to the City of 's inspection record. The record lists the inspection result as "" and the risk category as . The establishment was inspected again on 2026-09-04, with the result recorded as "Pass," the same record shows. The record carries two violations. Under violation 38, INSECTS, RODENTS, & ANIMALS NOT PRESENT, the inspector wrote: "OBSERVED THE PEST CONTROL LOG BOOK NOT MAINTAINED. THE LAST PEST INSPECTION REPORT IN THE PEST CONTROL LOG BOOK IS DATED 6/11/25. MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTED THAT A MINIMUM OF 2 PEST CONTROL SERVICE VISITS ARE REQUIRED PER YEAR AND MUST BE KEPT IN THE PEST CONTROL LOG BOOK FOR REVIEW. PRIORITY FOUNDATION VIOLATION 7-38-020(C). CITATION ISSUED." Under violation 43, IN-USE UTENSILS: PROPERLY STORED, the inspector wrote: "OBSERVED THE ICE SCOOP STORED ON TOP OF THE ICE MACHINE. MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTED TO STORE THE ICE SCOOP IN A CLEAN CONTAINER." The record does not state whether anyone became ill.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 110 Sept 2026, 09:54current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.