FirstAlerts

Tacos del Barrio on N Milwaukee Ave in Chicago failed its inspection, city record shows

The Chicago inspection record for the Cook County establishment lists a Sept. 8, 2026 result of Fail and six recorded violations; the record shows no later inspection.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 10, 2026, 9:23 a.m. ET
, at in , , according to the City of 's inspection record for the establishment. The record gives the inspection date as Sept. 8, 2026, the result as , and the risk category as . The record lists six violations as the inspector wrote them: - 10. ADEQUATE HANDWASHING SINKS PROPERLY SUPPLIED AND ACCESSIBLE — "OBSERVED WATER TEMPERATURE READING AT 130F AT HAND SINK IN UNISEX TOILET ROOM. WATER TEMPERATURE MUST BE BETWEEN 100-120F AT HAND WASHING SINK. PRIORITY FOUNDATION VIOLATION. 7-38-030(C)." - 10. ADEQUATE HANDWASHING SINKS PROPERLY SUPPLIED AND ACCESSIBLE — "MUST PROVIDE EMPLOYEE HAND WASHING SIGNAGE IN BOTH TOILET ROOMS AND AT HAND SINK IN PREP AREA." - 39. CONTAMINATION PREVENTED DURING FOOD PREPARATION, STORAGE & DISPLAY — "OBSERVED NO BARRIER BETWEEN FOOD PREP SERVING LINE AND CUSTOMER ORDERING LINE. MUST PROVIDE. PRIORITY VIOLATION. 7-38-005." - 51. PLUMBING INSTALLED; PROPER BACKFLOW DEVICES — "OBSERVED NO HOT OR COLD RUNNING WATER AT 3-COMPARTMENT SINK IN BASEMENT DISHWASHING/PREP AREA. OBSERVED BROKEN KNOBS FOR HOT AND COLD WATER AND UNABLE TO TURN ON. MUST REPAIR." - 53. TOILET FACILITIES: PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED, SUPPLIED, & CLEANED — "MUST PROVIDE A GARBAGE WITH LID IN UNISEX TOILET ROOMS." - 55. PHYSICAL FACILITIES INSTALLED, MAINTAINED & CLEAN — "OBSERVED MISSING CEILING TILES IN BASEMENT PREP/DISHWASHING AREA. MUST REPAIR." The record is the source for the establishment, its address, the inspection date and result, the risk category and the listed violations.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 110 Sept 2026, 13:23current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.