Air India A320 in Delhi Incident Identified as VT-EXO; Pilot Drug Test Negative
The aircraft involved in the August 4 altitude loss has been identified, and the pilot-in-command tested negative for psychoactive substances.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 4, 2026, 8:21 a.m. ET
This report went out within minutes of the first account of it. Early reports are provisional and are frequently revised; where sources disagree, both readings are given.
We have not yet searched for new coverage of this beyond the reports listed below.
Earlier reports
Sep 4, 2026, 8:21 a.m. ETFirst report
Air India A320 Loses Altitude in Cruise; Probe Underway
An Air India Airbus A320-251N, registration VT-EXO, was involved in an incident during cruise on August 4, 2026, according to siasat.com. The flight, AI 2379, suddenly lost 300 feet of altitude. There were 145 people on board, and 24 injuries were reported by siasat.com. The event is still developing, and the cause has not been determined.
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) are investigating. AAIB said a detailed probe is underway. The pilot-in-command was found non-negative for psychoactive substances in the confirmatory test, and AAIB recommended DGCA take appropriate actions to prevent abuse of psychoactive substances, according to siasat.com. The cause of the altitude loss has not been determined.
Registry records list the aircraft as an Airbus twin-engine jet landplane registered in India. The registered owner is not identified in the provided facts.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Registration
- VT-EXO
- Type
- AIRBUS — twin-engine jet landplane
- Terrain elevation
- 722 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 5.7 miles N of Safdarjung Airport (VIDD)
Sources
Revision history
- Version 14 Sept 2026, 12:22current
First published.
- Version 14 Sept 2026, 12:21current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.