FirstAlerts

Air India Boeing 787 in Ahmedabad crash identified as VT-ANB

The aircraft involved in the June 12 crash near Ahmedabad has been identified as a Boeing 787-8 registered VT-ANB, according to registry records.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 31, 2026, 8:49 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 31, 2026, 7:49 a.m. ETWritten Aug 31, 2026, 8:52 a.m. ET
Breaking news

This report went out within minutes of the first account of it. Early reports are provisional and are frequently revised; where sources disagree, both readings are given.

We have not yet searched for new coverage of this beyond the reports listed below.

The Boeing 787 that crashed during near , , on June 12, 2025, has been identified as registration , according to aircraft registry records. The twin-engine jet landplane, serial number 36279, is registered in . Registry records list the registered owner as ; the owner of record is not necessarily the operator of the flight. The crash killed people, with only one passenger, Vishwash Kumar Ramesh from Leicester, surviving, according to the Daily Mail. The cause of the crash has not been determined, and investigators are set to release a report later this year, the Daily Mail reported. saw a drop in passenger numbers on the India-UK route after the crash, the outlet reported.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 31, 2026, 8:49 a.m. ETFirst report

    Air India Boeing 787 crash in Ahmedabad kills 260, one survivor

    An Air India Boeing 787-8 crashed during takeoff near Ahmedabad, India, on June 12, 2025, killing 260 people, according to Daily Mail. Only one passenger, Vishwash Kumar Ramesh from Leicester, survived. The aircraft, registered VT-ANB, was identified from an official accident record (NTSB case DCA25WA232). Registry records list the registered owner as Air India; the owner of record is not necessarily the operator of the flight.

    The cause of the crash has not been determined. Investigators are set to release a report later this year. Air India saw a drop in passenger numbers on the India-UK route after the crash, according to Daily Mail.

    Air India, the flag carrier of India, has a history of other incidents involving its aircraft, including a 2018 Boeing 787 incident in Hong Kong and a 2017 Airbus A320 incident in New Delhi, according to NTSB records. These records say nothing about the cause of this accident.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Reference data

From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.

Registration
VT-ANB
Type
Boeing 787 8 — twin-engine jet landplane
Registered owner
Air IndiaThe owner of record is not necessarily the operator, the pilot, or otherwise connected to the flight.
Terrain elevation
167 ft
Nearest aerodrome
5.2 miles SW of Sardar Vallabh Patel International Airport (VAAH/AMD)

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 131 Aug 2026, 12:52current

    First published.

  2. Version 131 Aug 2026, 12:49current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.