FirstAlerts
Plane CrashesVersion 5

Five Dead in Amazon Prime Air Cargo Plane Crash at Miami Airport

A cargo plane overshot the runway and struck vehicles before catching fire; the cause is under investigation.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Sep 7, 2026, 5:08 p.m. ETUpdated Sep 8, 2026, 5:58 p.m. ET
A cargo plane crash at International Airport on September 6, 2026, killed people and injured others, according to reports from gdnonline.com and bgnes.com. The aircraft, operating for , overshot the runway and struck several vehicles near the airport before catching fire, according to reports from themiamihurricane.com and bgnes.com. More than 60 firefighters were dispatched to the scene, and Miami-Dade Fire Rescue reported multiple patients at the scene. The aircraft type is disputed: themiamihurricane.com reports it as a , while gdnonline.com and bgnes.com report it as a . The crash occurred during , with the time reported as by bgnes.com, by wpbf.com, and by themiamihurricane.com (). All runways and taxiways at the airport were closed, and a ground stop was in effect, according to reports. The National Transportation Safety Board said it is gathering information about the crash, and the Federal Aviation Administration will investigate, according to wpbf.com. The cause of the crash has not been determined.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Reference data

From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.

Terrain elevation
23 ft
Nearest aerodrome
6.2 miles ESE of Miami International Airport (KMIA/MIA)

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 58 Sept 2026, 21:58current

    Five Dead in Amazon Prime Air Cargo Plane Crash at Miami Airport

  2. Version 48 Sept 2026, 21:52

    Five dead in Amazon cargo plane crash at Miami airport

  3. Version 38 Sept 2026, 20:57

    Five dead in Amazon Prime Air cargo plane crash at Miami airport

  4. Version 27 Sept 2026, 20:52

    Added NTSB investigation status and corrected aircraft type attribution.

  5. Version 16 Sept 2026, 22:40

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.