Five killed as cargo plane crashes on landing in Miami
A Boeing 767-300 freighter overran a runway and struck vehicles, killing five, with the cause under investigation.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Terrain elevation
- 23 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 6.2 miles ESE of Miami International Airport (KMIA/MIA)
Sources
- Federal investigators probe Amazon cargo jets fiery runway crash that killed 5 in Miami | Company Business Newslivemint.com
- At least five killed in Amazon cargo plane crash at Miami airportcyprus-mail.com
- At Least 5 Killed in Amazon Prime Air Cargo Plane Crash in Miamichronicle.lu
- At least 5 killed, 5 injured after Amazon cargo plane crashes at Miami Int’l Airportclassiccountry98.com
- At least 5 killed in Amazon Prime Air cargo plane crash in Miamidailymaverick.co.za
- Horror crash as cargo plane skids off runway killing five peopledailypost.co.uk
- At least five killed in Amazon cargo plane crash in Miamiodt.co.nz
Revision history
- Version 57 Sept 2026, 20:22current
Updated to reflect the published status and refined source attribution.
- Version 47 Sept 2026, 10:22
Updated to include additional sources and clarify date discrepancies.
- Version 37 Sept 2026, 06:56
Updated to include the conflicting date reports and the investigation status.
- Version 27 Sept 2026, 04:55
Added conflicting date and investigation status details from both sources.
- Version 17 Sept 2026, 01:06
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.