NTSB Record Lists Two Dead, One Seriously Injured in Robinson R66 Accident Near Dawsonville, Georgia
The National Transportation Safety Board accident record shows three people were on board the helicopter, which came down at about 01:50 local time on 30 May 2026; the cause has not been determined.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Registration
- N4488H
- Type
- Robinson Helicopter Co R66 — single-engine turboprop helicopter
- Engines
- ROLLS-ROYC 250-C300
- Registered owner
- Pine Tours LlcThe owner of record is not necessarily the operator, the pilot, or otherwise connected to the flight.
- Terrain elevation
- 1,371 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 4.4 miles SE of Elliott Field (30GA)
Sources
Revision history
- Version 27 Aug 2026, 14:39current
Corrected the bearing between Dawsonville and Elliott Field (4.4 miles southeast, per reference data), clarified that the geocode locates the settlement rather than the accident site, and matched the registry's own wording for the aircraft configuration.
- Version 15 Aug 2026, 15:50
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.