Two Killed in Bell 407 Helicopter Crash Near Flagstaff, Arizona
The accident record lists two people on board, two fatalities and the aircraft destroyed; the National Transportation Safety Board is investigating.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Registration
- N56AZ
- Type
- Bell 407 — single-engine turboprop helicopter
- Engines
- ROLLS-ROYC 250-C47B
- Built
- 2004-01-01 (22 years old)
- Registered owner
- State Of Arizona Department Of Public SafetyThe owner of record is not necessarily the operator, the pilot, or otherwise connected to the flight.
- Terrain elevation
- 6,909 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 4.2 miles NNE of Flagstaff Pulliam Airport (KFLG/FLG)
Sources
- https://www.azdps.gov/organization/aviation-services
- https://www.azdps.gov/colonel
- https://www.airmedandrescue.com/latest/long-read/provider-profile-arizona-department-public-safety
- https://verticalmag.com/features/arizona-aerial-troopers-ready-for-action/
- https://recruitment.azdps.gov/
- https://dffm.az.gov/aviation
- https://www.governmentjobs.com/careers/azdps/jobs/newprint/1343888
Revision history
- Version 37 Aug 2026, 14:53current
Added owner-background detail on the 1969 helicopter expansion (ASU joint venture) and Phoenix Sky Harbor maintenance/fixed-wing base; no change to facts of the accident.
- Version 25 Aug 2026, 20:38
Corrected the bearing between Flagstaff and Pulliam Airport (4.2 miles NNE, per geographic reference data) and trimmed redundant aerodrome distances.
- Version 15 Aug 2026, 18:31
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.