One dead in Piper PA-24 crash near Hazen, North Dakota
The accident record lists the aircraft as destroyed and one person on board; the National Transportation Safety Board is investigating and the cause has not been determined.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Registration
- N6852P
- Type
- Piper PA-24-250 — single-engine piston landplane
- Engines
- LYCOMING 0-540 SERIES
- Built
- 1960-01-01 (66 years old)
- Registered owner
- Hauf Michael LThe owner of record is not necessarily the operator, the pilot, or otherwise connected to the flight.
- Terrain elevation
- 1,749 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 2.0 miles W of Mercer County Regional Airport (KHZE)
Sources
No sources recorded.
Revision history
- Version 27 Aug 2026, 14:18current
Corrected the bearings to the nearby aerodromes and clarified that the geographic reference data locates the settlement, not the accident site.
- Version 15 Aug 2026, 15:26
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.