NTSB Investigating Cessna 208B Accident Near Healy, Alaska
The accident record lists substantial damage to a Wright Air Service Cessna 208B near Healy on September 23, 2025; the cause has not been determined.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Registration
- N976E
- Type
- Cessna 208 B — single-engine turboprop landplane
- Operator of record
- Wright Air Service
- Registered owner
- Wright Air ServiceThe owner of record is not necessarily the operator, the pilot, or otherwise connected to the flight.
- Terrain elevation
- 1,572 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 3.2 miles N of KJ Field (US-7045)
Sources
- https://wrightairservice.com/
- https://wrightairservice.com/wright-air-history/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_Air_Service
- https://www.alaskacompanydir.com/companies/wright-air-service-inc/
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/ken-michaelis-39847855/
- https://www.aircharterguide.com/Operator_Info/WRIGHT+AIR+SERVICE/1617/FAIRBANKS/1786
- https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.wright_air_service_inc.9613d98262d73bbcc21860ebe5be1a7e.html
Revision history
- Version 37 Aug 2026, 14:19current
Added the operator's certificate number (HYTA069A) as listed in the background sources; no change to the accident facts.
- Version 25 Aug 2026, 20:49
Corrected the bearings between Healy and nearby aerodromes to match the geographic reference data and clarified that they locate the settlement, not the accident site.
- Version 15 Aug 2026, 20:46
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.