FirstAlerts

Inquest opened into deaths of two men in Essex plane crash near Ongar

Essex Police has asked the coroner to suspend proceedings pending a criminal investigation running alongside an Air Accidents Investigation Branch probe.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 19, 2026, 7:23 p.m. ET
men died when a came down near on Monday 30 June 2025, The Independent reported. The aircraft had taken off from North Weald airfield around seven miles away and was conducting what Essex Police described as a "short flight experience", with only the men on board. The men were named as Dylan Patel, 26, from Southall in London, who was the pilot of the aircraft, and Vamshi Mandala, 25, from India, according to The Independent. Post-mortem examinations provisionally found that both men died from "multiple injuries", pending toxicology results. The cause of the crash has not been determined. The Air Accidents Investigation Branch confirmed it is investigating and that inspectors were at the scene. Lincoln Brookes, the senior coroner for Essex, said he had received a request from Essex Police to suspend inquest proceedings pending a criminal investigation running in parallel to the AAIB probe. Neither force nor branch has stated a finding as to what happened. Brookes opened an inquest and adjourned it to a date to be set.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Reference data

From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 119 Aug 2026, 23:23current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.