Three Killed in Aerostar 601 Crash Near Lake Clear, New York
The National Transportation Safety Board's accident record lists three people on board and three fatalities in the July 14, 2026 crash; the cause has not been determined.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Registration
- N800AA
- Type
- Smith AEROSTAR 601P — twin-engine piston landplane
- Engines
- LYCOMING IO-540 SER
- Registered owner
- J I B LlcThe owner of record is not necessarily the operator, the pilot, or otherwise connected to the flight.
- Terrain elevation
- 1,644 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 1.9 miles SW of Adirondack Regional Airport (KSLK/SLK)
Sources
No sources recorded.
Revision history
- Version 27 Aug 2026, 14:32current
Corrected the bearings between Lake Clear and the three nearby aerodromes to match the geographic reference data, and clarified that the elevation and distances describe the settlement, not the accident site.
- Version 15 Aug 2026, 15:02
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.