FirstAlerts

Pentagon Admits US Airstrikes Killed 150 Yemeni Civilians, Report Says

Truthout reports the Pentagon has acknowledged 150 civilian deaths in US strikes in Yemen, including an attack on Ras Issa Port that Human Rights Watch called an apparent war crime.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 12, 2026, 1:55 p.m. ETWritten Aug 20, 2026, 6:20 p.m. ET
Breaking news

This report went out within minutes of the first account of it. Early reports are provisional and are frequently revised; where sources disagree, both readings are given.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 20, 2026, 6:41 p.m. ET — checked 1h ago.

The US Department of Defense has acknowledged that American airstrikes in killed civilians and wounded others, according to a report by Truthout. The strikes were part of an operation authorized by President Donald Trump targeting Houthi rebels. The deadliest single attack was on Ras Issa Port in , which killed 80 people and wounded 171, Truthout reported. The Pentagon initially said the strikes caused no civilian deaths and has not publicly acknowledged the casualties, Truthout reported. Human Rights Watch described the attack on Ras Issa Port as an apparent war crime, according to Truthout. The investigation into the strikes is ongoing, and the Pentagon has not yet publicly commented on the report.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Reference data

From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.

Terrain elevation
30 ft
Nearest aerodrome
3.5 miles NNW of Hodeida International Airport (OYHD)

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 120 Aug 2026, 22:20current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.