Pilot Killed in Cirrus Crash West of Bend, Oregon; Cause Not Determined
KTVZ, KPTV and NBC16 each report one death in the August 4, 2026 crash near Bull Creek, with the NTSB and FAA investigating.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 6, 2026, 7:22 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 6, 2026, 7:22 a.m. ETFirst report
Pilot Killed in Bend, Oregon, Plane Crash Was Indicted Hours Earlier, KTVZ Reports
A pilot was killed in a plane crash near Bend, Oregon, on August 4, 2026, according to reporting by KTVZ. The event is still developing and details remain limited.
KTVZ reported that the pilot, Steven Nicholas Charlton, was facing five felony counts of first-degree invasion of personal privacy in Deschutes County Court, and that a Deschutes County grand jury returned a five-count indictment against him on August 4, with an arraignment scheduled for August 6. KTVZ reported that the criminal filings contain no information about the plane or the crash and establish no connection to it.
The cause of the crash has not been determined. No registration or other identifying details for the aircraft are in the available material, and the aircraft has not been identified. The available material gives no information on the number of people aboard beyond the pilot.
Geographic reference data places Bend in Deschutes County, Oregon, at a settlement elevation of 3,632 feet, and lists the city as 2.1 miles west-northwest of Pilot Butte Airport (8OR5), 4.4 miles north-northwest of D M Stevenson Ranch Airport (OR30) and 6.2 miles west-southwest of Bend Municipal Airport (KBDN). That reference locates the city, not the accident site. The state of the official investigation has not been reported in the available material.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Terrain elevation
- 3,632 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 2.1 miles WNW of Pilot Butte Airport (8OR5)
Sources
- New Information: One Person Dead Following Plane Crash in Deschutes Countyktvz.com
- Pilot dies in plane crash west of Bendkptv.com
- Aircraft crashes west of Bend; pilot deadnbc16.com
- BREAKING NEWS: Pilot identified in deadly plane crash, Aircraft brought down intentionally according to investigatorsktvz.com
- Developing Story: Pilot killed in plane crash indicted by Deschutes Grand Jury hours before incidentktvz.com
- Developing Story: Pilot killed in plane crash indicted by Deschutes Grand Jury hours before incidentktvz.com
- Pilot killed in plane crash indicted by Deschutes County Grand Jury hours before incident, case dismissed following deathktvz.com
Revision history
- Version 77 Aug 2026, 14:56current
No new facts; headline and dek revised and attribution wording tightened.
- Version 67 Aug 2026, 12:49
Condensed the court-record paragraph; no new facts added.
- Version 56 Aug 2026, 23:36
Added KTVZ report that Deschutes County Circuit Court records show the criminal case against the pilot was dismissed as of August 6, and updated the headline accordingly.
- Version 26 Aug 2026, 11:22current
Corrected the bearings for the nearby aerodromes to match the reference data and clarified that the aircraft identity and occupant count are absent from the available material.
- Version 16 Aug 2026, 05:06
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.