FirstAlerts

Pilot Reported Severe Weather Before Washington Float Plane Crash, NTSB Says

A de Havilland DHC-3 Otter crashed near Sucia Island, Washington, on July 23, seriously injuring the pilot and two passengers.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 20, 2026, 4:55 p.m. ET
The pilot of a float plane changed course to avoid a thunderstorm and reported severe weather that prevented the flight from continuing, according to a report from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) cited by Castanet. The plane crashed near in the San Juan Islands, Washington, on July 23, and erupted in flames. The pilot and two passengers were seriously injured, and eight passengers received minor injuries, the NTSB report said. A post-accident fire destroyed the fuselage after all passengers and the pilot had exited. The aircraft, a , was up to date on maintenance, with its latest 100-hour inspection completed on June 25, according to Castanet. The cause of the crash has not been determined; the NTSB's report is part of an ongoing investigation. The aircraft involved has not been identified. Registry records list as operating 29 aircraft, of which 22 match the reported type, but those records do not identify the specific aircraft in this incident.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Reference data

From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.

Terrain elevation
108 ft
Nearest aerodrome
3.5 miles N of Orcas Island Airport (KORS/ESD)

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 120 Aug 2026, 20:55current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.