FirstAlerts
Plane CrashesVersion 2

Army Halts Apache Training Flights After Fatal Texas Crash That Killed Two Soldiers

The two soldiers killed in the August 11 crash near Fort Hood have been identified; the cause has not been determined.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 14, 2026, 9:45 p.m. ETUpdated Aug 19, 2026, 3:23 a.m. ET
people were killed when a crashed during a training mission near , , according to reporting by WMTW and WYFF, which put the crash on August 11, 2026. CNN, which described the aircraft as an and placed the crash at , gave the date as August 12, 2026. All three outlets reported deaths. WMTW and WYFF located the crash site near , not far from . Those killed were identified as Chief Warrant Officer Deontre Huey, 34, and Warrant Officer Seth Olmstead, 25, both of Bravo Company, 1st Battalion, 227th Aviation Regiment, 1st Air Cavalry Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, the three outlets reported. The cause has not been determined. The Army temporarily halted all Apache helicopter training missions on Friday, August 14, directing a temporary stand-down of training flight operations, the outlets reported. WMTW and WYFF reported ; CNN reported the Army said it would remain in effect until it has a better understanding of the root cause of the accident. The outlets noted that the Apache has been a core part of Army aviation since the first one was delivered in 1984, and that more than 5,000 Apaches have been deployed by the U.S. military and its allies. The aircraft involved has not been identified in the available reporting; registry records list one aircraft under the , which is not an identification of the helicopter in this crash. The and the Army Combat Readiness Center are investigating, according to the three outlets.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Reference data

From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.

Terrain elevation
614 ft
Nearest aerodrome
1.8 miles N of Salado Airport (73TA)

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 219 Aug 2026, 07:23current

    Added CNN's differing date, aircraft designation and location and its wording of the stand-down; named the two soldiers killed and their unit; added the Army Combat Readiness Center as an investigating body; removed the "developing" framing.

  2. Version 118 Aug 2026, 23:52

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.