Aircraft in Varanasi Airport Firearm Discharge Identified as VT-BWI Through Flight Tracking Data
The registration of the Air India Express aircraft operating flight IX 1810 has been derived from flight tracking data and has not been confirmed by any official record.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 19, 2026, 4:41 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 19, 2026, 4:41 a.m. ETFirst report
Two Screening Staff Injured in Accidental Firearm Discharge at Varanasi Airport
Two airport screening personnel were injured when a licensed firearm discharged accidentally at Lal Bahadur Shastri International Airport in Varanasi at approximately 9:30 am on 16 August 2026, according to thehindubusinessline.com. The matter is developing and the cause has not been determined.
The outlet reported that a passenger, Kamlesh Kedarnath Rai, declared a licensed 7.62 mm pistol with 21 live cartridges at the Varanasi airport check-in counter for Air India Express flight IX 1810. Two screening personnel, named by the outlet as Rohit Raj and Suman Kumari, were injured and shifted to New Lakshmi Trauma Centre in Varanasi. Neetu Kadyan, Deputy Commissioner of Police for the Gomti Zone, said both injured individuals were in stable condition. The outlet reported that the passenger has been detained for investigation and further action, and that flight operations at the airport continued without disruption.
The Bureau of Civil Aviation Security has launched a formal inquiry and is examining the circumstances leading to the incident, including adherence to prescribed procedures for the handling and carriage of licensed weapons at airports, according to the same report. Phulpur police are taking further legal action.
The aircraft has not been officially identified. Flight tracking data points to the registration VT-BWI, but no official record confirms which airframe was involved.
Weather observations recorded at the airport 60 minutes from the reported time, at a station 12.1 miles away, show wind from 70° at 4 knots, visibility 1.86 statute miles in mist, scattered cloud at 10,000 feet and a temperature of 88°F. The reading is an instrument measurement and is not connected to what happened.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Terrain elevation
- 259 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 12 miles SE of Lal Bahadur Shastri International Airport (VEBN/VNS)
Sources
Revision history
- Version 119 Aug 2026, 08:42current
First published.
- Version 119 Aug 2026, 08:41current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.