NTSB Investigating Grand Canyon Airlines Twin Otter Accident Near Whitmore, Arizona
Accident record lists six people on board with six minor injuries after the August 9, 2025 accident; the cause has not been determined.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Registration
- N189GC
- Type
- Dehavilland DHC-6-300 — twin-engine turboprop landplane
- Engines
- P&W CANADA PT6A-27
- Registered owner
- Cortez Fisher LlcThe owner of record is not necessarily the operator, the pilot, or otherwise connected to the flight.
- Terrain elevation
- 1,624 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 8.0 miles SSE of Grand Canyon Bar Ten Airstrip (1Z1/GCT)
Sources
No sources recorded.
Revision history
- Version 27 Aug 2026, 13:52current
Corrected the direction of the nearby airstrip relative to the settlement and noted the geographic reference locates the settlement only; added the owner's Washington company number and incorporation date and the specific Twin Otter registrations held.
- Version 15 Aug 2026, 23:01
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.