Nanjing Wu Hai Expands Recall of Alanca 6-Drawer Dressers
The recall now covers additional units of Alanca 6-Drawer Wood Dressers due to tip-over and entrapment hazards.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 3, 2026, 10:54 a.m. ET
CPSC Reports Injuries in Alanca Dresser Recall
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has reported injuries in connection with the recall of Alanca 6-Drawer Dressers, according to a recall notice dated September 3, 2026. The notice states that no injuries were previously reported, but the agency now reports injuries have occurred. The CPSC did not specify the number or nature of the injuries.
The recall, initiated September 3, 2026, involves about 261 Alanca-branded 6-Drawer Wood Dressers sold in brown and white. The dressers measure about 15.75 inches wide, 57 inches long and 31.5 inches tall and weigh about 55 pounds. Model numbers “WH-DS02-6W” or “WH-DS02-6GE” are printed on the packaging.
The dressers are unstable if not anchored to the wall, posing tip-over and entrapment hazards that can result in serious injury or death to children, and violate the STURDY Act's mandatory safety standards, the CPSC said. Consumers should stop using the recalled dressers immediately if not anchored, place them out of children's reach, and contact Nanjing Wu Hai Smart Home for a full refund. Consumers will be asked to write “RECALLED” in permanent marker on the top, front and sides, remove all drawers, and send photos to Nanjingdresserrecall@NanjingWuhai.com.
Sep 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m. ETFirst report
Alanca 6-Drawer Dressers Recalled Due to Tip-Over and Entrapment Hazards
On September 3, 2026, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall of Alanca 6-Drawer Wood Dressers, according to the agency's recall notice. The recall involves about 261 dressers sold in brown and white, each with six drawers, measuring about 15.75 inches wide, 57 inches long, and 31.5 inches tall, and weighing about 55 pounds. The model numbers “WH-DS02-6W” or “WH-DS02-6GE” are printed on the packaging.
The recalled dressers are unstable if not anchored to the wall, posing tip-over and entrapment hazards that can result in serious injury or death to children, and they violate the mandatory safety standards under the STURDY Act, the CPSC notice states. No injuries have been reported.
The CPSC notice instructs consumers to immediately stop using the recalled dressers if they are not anchored to the wall, place them in an area inaccessible to children, and contact Nanjing Wu Hai Smart Home Appliance Store for a full refund. Consumers will be asked to write “RECALLED” in permanent marker on the top, front, and sides of the dressers, remove all drawers, and send photos of the marked and disassembled dressers to Nanjingdresserrecall@NanjingWuhai.com.
The recall notice lists the firm as Nanjing Wu Hai Smart Home Appliance Store. The CPSC's database records no other enforcement action by this firm.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 15:24current
First published.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 14:47current
First published.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 14:54current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.