FDA Reports Class II Recall of 950 Medical Convenience Kits

Windstone Medical Packaging recalled 950 convenience kits containing lidocaine injections recalled by their manufacturer over supplier quality issues.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 20, 2026, 2:53 a.m. ET

On August 5, 2026, FDA enforcement records listed an recall initiated on June 17, 2026, by Billings-based for 950 medical convenience kits. The recall, registered under recall number , was issued because the kits contain Elevaris Lidocaine HCl injection USP, which was recalled by Elevaris Medical Devices Inc. due to supplier quality issues. The affected products are AMS ALIGNED MEDICAL SOLUTIONS convenience kits covering specific part and lot numbers: Nerve Block Tray - RX (Part Number AMS13975A, UDI/DI B098AMS13975A0, Lot Numbers 230376 and 241103); Universal Block Tray- RX (Part Number AMS2009, UDI/DI B098AMS20090, Lot Numbers 216938 and 240939); and Nerve Block Tray - RX (Part Number AMS3224, UDI/DI B098AMS32240, Lot Numbers 231314). Distribution was nationwide across 22 states: AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, IL, KS, LA, MA, MD, MN, MO, NH, NJ, NV, NY, OR, PA, TX, VA, and WA. is the FDA's middle classification category, used where a product may cause temporary or medically reversible harm, and where the chance of serious harm is remote. FDA enforcement database records list no other prior enforcement actions for

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

Version 120 Aug 2026, 06:53current
First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.