FDA Records Show Ongoing Recall of 24 Medical Convenience Kits

Windstone Medical Packaging recalled 24 medical convenience kits containing Lidocaine due to supplier quality issues.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 20, 2026, 7:53 a.m. ET

On August 5, 2026, FDA enforcement records listed an recall initiated on June 17, 2026, by of . The action carries recall number and covers a quantity of . The affected product is described in FDA records as AMS ALIGNED MEDICAL SOLUTIONS medical convenience kits labeled as: Heart Cath Tray - RX, Part Number DDS1159B. Recalled items carry UDI/DI B098DDS1159B0 and Lot Numbers: 214412. According to the FDA enforcement report, Windstone Medical Packaging issued the recall for kits containing Elevaris Lidocaine HCl injection USP because Elevaris Medical Devices Inc. recalled the Lidocaine HCl injection USP due to supplier quality issues. US Nationwide distribution occurred in the states of AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, IL, KS, LA, MA, MD, MN, MO, NH, NJ, NV, NY, OR, PA, TX, VA, WA. The FDA designated the action as a recall. The agency defines as its middle category, used where the product may cause temporary or medically reversible harm, and where the chance of serious harm is remote. Agency database records show no other enforcement action for

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

Version 120 Aug 2026, 11:53current
First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.