FirstAlerts

Skip Hop Expands Recall of Baby Sesame Street Elmo Silicone Teethers

The recall now covers additional model numbers due to a choking hazard.

3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 3, 2026, 11:23 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Sep 4, 2026, 5:38 a.m. ETWritten Sep 4, 2026, 5:52 a.m. ET
has expanded its recall of , according to a notice from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission () reported by Medical Daily. The recall, initiated on September 3, 2026, now includes model number 9R263210. The agency reported units were sold at . The said the toy's black eyes can detach if frozen, posing a choking risk to infants. The recall was prompted by four consumer reports of the eyes coming off. The recall number is . Consumers should . The database records no other enforcement action by this firm.

Earlier reports

  1. Sep 4, 2026, 5:46 a.m. ET

    CPSC Reports Injuries in Skip Hop Elmo Teether Recall

    The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has reported injuries in connection with the recall of Skip Hop Baby Sesame Street Elmo Silicone Teethers, according to a recall notice published September 3, 2026. The notice states that no injuries had been reported at the time of the initial announcement, but the agency now reports injuries have occurred. The CPSC did not specify the number or nature of the injuries.

    The recall, initiated September 3, 2026, covers about 22,660 teethers with model number 9R263210, sold at Carter's retail stores nationwide and online at carters.com and skiphop.com. The CPSC says the toy's black eyes can detach if frozen, posing a choking hazard to infants. The recall was prompted by four consumer reports of the eyes coming off.

    The CPSC advises consumers to stop using the recalled teether immediately, take it away from children, and contact the company for a refund and disposal instructions. The recall number is 26739. The CPSC's database records no other enforcement action by Skip Hop.

  2. Sep 3, 2026, 11:23 a.m. ETFirst report

    Skip Hop Recalls Baby Sesame Street Elmo Silicone Teethers Due to Choking Hazard

    On September 3, 2026, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall of the Skip Hop Baby Sesame Street Elmo Silicone Teether. The recall notice states that the black eyes can detach from the teether if frozen, posing a risk of serious injury or death from a choking hazard. The CPSC reports that Skip Hop Inc. has received four consumer reports of the eyes detaching, but no injuries have been reported.

    The recalled product is shaped like Elmo's face (red, orange, and white with black eyes) and includes a textured blue key and a fabric crayon box. The model number 9R263210 is printed on a red tag attached to the side of the crayon box. About 22,660 units were sold in the U.S., and about 3,177 were sold in Canada.

    Consumers should stop using the recalled teether immediately, take it away from children, and contact Skip Hop Inc. at www.skiphoprecall.com to obtain a refund in the form of a gift card and further instructions on disposal. The gift card can be used at any The William Carter Company brand store, including Carter's, Skip Hop, OshKosh B'gosh, and Little Planet. The recall number is 26739.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 14 Sept 2026, 09:52current

    First published.

  2. Version 13 Sept 2026, 15:23current

    First published.

  3. Version 14 Sept 2026, 09:46current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.