BenQ Recalls About 1,249 GV31 Portable Projectors Over Battery Overheating Risk
A CPSC notice issued July 30, 2026 says the projectors' lithium-ion battery can overheat, with three overheating reports including one causing burns to a person's hands.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/BenQ-America-Recalls-GV31-Portable-Projectors-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death-from-Fire-and-Burn-Hazards
- https://www.projectorcentral.com/benq-gv31.htm
- https://www.benq.com/en-us/projector/portable/gv31/spec.html
- https://www.benq.eu/content/dam/b2c/en-eu/support/download/datasheet/projector/gv31-datasheet-eng.pdf
Revision history
- Version 67 Aug 2026, 13:39current
Added headline and dek; removed the closing line about the notice being newly issued; no factual changes.
- Version 57 Aug 2026, 09:17
Replaced the generic product-class description with the GV31's specific published specifications from manufacturer and ProjectorCentral reference sources, and added those source URLs.
- Version 47 Aug 2026, 04:44
Replaced unsupported manufacturer datasheet specifications with the general product description from the cited background reference sources, and added a headline and dek.
- Version 37 Aug 2026, 00:23
Removed the unsupported AndroidGuys attribution and rebuilt the product-description paragraph on BenQ's own datasheet and specification page, adding brightness, resolution, rotation, audio, input and streaming details and noting no stated country of manufacture.
- Version 26 Aug 2026, 19:39
Replaced the generic projector-technology background with device-specific description sourced to BenQ's product specification page and an AndroidGuys review, including DLP/LED engine, 1080p output, HDMI/USB-C inputs and 5,800 mAh battery rated for about 180 minutes.
- Version 16 Aug 2026, 14:50
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.