FirstAlerts
Recalls & Safety Alerts

FDA Records Class II Recall for Big Way Hot Pot Miso Paste Over Undeclared Milk

Big Way Ca Inc has recalled 65 cases of hot pot miso paste distributed to two affiliated restaurants.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 18, 2026, 9:58 a.m. ET
On August 12, 2026, official FDA enforcement records published an recall initiated on July 24, 2026, by for of Big Way Hot Pot "Hot Pot Miso Paste". The developing recall was issued due to Calculated from the unit count and pack size, the total volume is about 65 kgs. The product is packaged in 1kg (35.3oz) generic bulk unit packaging labeled with Item No. CKJ19067, Lot code 20251106Z1-1, and an expiration date of NOV/05/2026. Official records state that distribution was made exclusively to two affiliated restaurants. According to reference sources on miso products, hot pot miso paste in generic catering-size bulk packaging is supplied directly to food service kitchens to flavor simmering broths, meaning members of the public would encounter it as an ingredient in prepared meals rather than as a retail package bought off a shelf. The FDA classifies a recall as one involving a product that may cause temporary or medically reversible health consequences, or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote. The agency states that undeclared allergens pose a risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reactions to people with an allergy or severe sensitivity, while those without the allergy are unaffected. FDA database records list no other enforcement actions for . Agency records show 728 food recalls citing undeclared allergens over the last two years.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 118 Aug 2026, 13:58current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.