FDA Reports Ongoing Recall of Quantum Rehab Powered Wheelchairs Over Software Issue

An ongoing recall covers 1,102 Quantum Outback powered wheelchairs whose controller software may cause unexpected braking or system crashes.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 18, 2026, 2:56 a.m. ET

Developing · not yet checked for updates

This recall is open. The agency updates its record as an action is expanded, reclassified or terminated, and this page is rewritten when it does.

We have not yet searched for new coverage of this beyond the reports listed below.

According to FDA enforcement records, an recall is active for 1,102 Quantum Outback powered wheelchairs produced by The recall was initiated on June 25, 2026, and officially reported by the FDA on August 12, 2026. The developing action involves Quantum Rehab brand Quantum Outback models equipped with controller software version 2.0.11, identified by lot code Quantum Outback 0060650920024*0 K112815 D143578 41875 ITI. According to the FDA enforcement report, if a user selects the "Remind Me Later" option for user reminders, reminder pop-up messages may appear while the wheelchair is in use. If this occurs while driving the wheelchair, the wheelchair may perform an unexpected park brake stop, which may result in fall or injury. If this occurs while not driving the wheelchair, the control system may crash and remain in pre-operational mode. Software version 2.0.13 is listed as the new software version. The agency classified the action as under recall number . According to FDA definitions, is the agency's middle category, used where the product may cause temporary or medically reversible harm, and where the chance of serious harm is remote. FDA enforcement records state the product had worldwide distribution, including US nationwide distribution across states, the District of Columbia, Canada, and Australia. FDA database records list no other enforcement actions for

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

Version 118 Aug 2026, 06:56current
First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.