FirstAlerts

FDA Reports Closure of United Orthopedic Corp. Surgical Adaptor Recall

The FDA has closed a Class II recall involving two femoral valgus adaptors used in knee-replacement surgery sets.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 18, 2026, 5:56 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 18, 2026, 7:59 a.m. ET
Developing · not yet checked for updates

This recall is open. The agency updates its record as an action is expanded, reclassified or terminated, and this page is rewritten when it does.

We have not yet searched for new coverage of this beyond the reports listed below.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported on August 12, 2026, that a recall initiated on May 20, 2026, by has been closed, meaning the agency considers the recall action carried out. The recall covered two units of femoral valgus adaptors distributed to surgical facilities in Texas and Michigan under recall number . The affected items are left and right femoral valgus adaptors for the U2 Total Knee System, catalog numbers 9323-5333 and 9323-5334. The specific identifying codes are product number 9323-5333 with UDI-DI 04719886908084 and lot number 25FB50, alongside product number 9323-5334 with UDI-DI 04719886908091 and lot number 25FB51. According to the official FDA enforcement report, the recall was initiated due to incomplete processing of a component screw by a subcontractor, which prevented proper assembly of the stem trail. The FDA defines a classification as a situation where use of or exposure to a recall product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences, or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote. FDA registry records and product clearance documentation specify that the instrument is a reusable, hand-held manual orthopedic tool used by surgical staff to align femoral cuts during knee arthroplasty, rather than an implanted device. FDA database records reflect no other enforcement actions for

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 18, 2026, 5:56 a.m. ETFirst report

    FDA Reports Ongoing Recall of Surgical Adaptors by United Orthopedic Corp.

    On August 12, 2026, the FDA published an enforcement report detailing an ongoing Class II recall initiated on May 20, 2026, by United Orthopedic Corp. The recall, registered under recall number Z-2885-2026, covers a quantity of 2 units distributed in Texas and Michigan.

    The recalled products are manual orthopedic surgical instruments from the U2 Total Knee System, identified as left and right femoral valgus adaptors. The recall covers model/catalog number 9323-5333 (UDI-DI 04719886908084, lot number 25FB50) and model/catalog number 9323-5334 (UDI-DI 04719886908091, lot number 25FB51). According to the FDA enforcement report, the action was taken due to an incomplete process of the component screw by a subcontractor which prevents the properly assembling of stem trail.

    According to federal regulatory and patent records, a femoral valgus adaptor is a piece of reusable operating-room hardware supplied to surgical facilities to help set the thigh bone alignment angle during knee replacement surgery. The FDA defines a Class II recall as a situation in which use of or exposure to a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences, or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote. FDA database records reflect no other enforcement actions for United Orthopedic Corp.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 118 Aug 2026, 09:56current

    First published.

  2. Version 118 Aug 2026, 11:59current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.