Britax Expands Recall of More Than 114,000 Car Seats Over Handle Defect
NHTSA says a screw in the carrying handle may loosen, causing partial detachment and increasing injury risk.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 28, 2026, 2:32 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 28, 2026, 2:32 p.m. ETFirst report
Britax Recalls More Than 114,000 Car Seats Over Handle Defect
Britax is recalling more than 114,000 child car seats in the U.S. because a screw in the carrying handle may come loose, "causing the handle to partially detach," according to a notice from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reported by abc7.com. The recall was initiated on August 20, 2026, and the hazard is that a child may fall after a partial detachment, increasing the risk of injury.
The recall covers the following models: B-Safe Gen 2, B-Safe Gen 2 Flexfit, B-Safe Gen 2 Flexfit Plus, B-Safe 35, B-Safe Ultra, and Endeavours. Owners of affected car seats will be mailed recall notices on October 19, according to the report.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 128 Aug 2026, 18:36current
First published.
- Version 128 Aug 2026, 18:32current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.