Evergreen Fresh Sprouts, LLC. Recalls Broccoli Sprouts; Check Use-By Dates
The recall covers broccoli sprouts with expiration dates of 9/7, 9/9, 9/11, 9/14 and 9/16 and Use By dates of 9/07/26, 9/09/26, 9/11/26, 9/14/26, and 9/16/26.
4 reports on this incident · first at Sep 10, 2026, 11:47 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 10, 2026, 11:52 p.m. ET
Two Hospitalized in Broccoli Sprout Salmonella Recall
Two people have been hospitalized and no deaths have been reported in connection with recalled broccoli sprouts, Medical Daily reported.
The recall, initiated September 4, 2026, covers broccoli sprouts from Evergreen Fresh Sprouts, LLC, distributed to grocery stores, food co-ops, restaurants and food service customers in Idaho, Montana and Washington, according to Medical Daily. The products carry expiration dates of 9/7, 9/9, 9/11, 9/14 and 9/16.
Medical Daily reported that the recall followed a sample collected and analyzed by Montana officials that tested positive for Salmonella. The CDC and the FDA are involved, according to the outlet.
Consumers are advised not to eat the recalled broccoli sprouts and to throw them away or return them to the store, Medical Daily reported. The recall was reported September 9, 2026, and remains ongoing.
Sep 10, 2026, 11:52 p.m. ET
FDA and CDC Close Broccoli Sprout Salmonella Recall
The CDC and the FDA have closed the action on a recall of broccoli sprouts from Evergreen Fresh Sprouts, LLC, according to medicaldaily.com. The closure means the agencies consider the recall carried out.
The recall, initiated on September 4, 2026, covered broccoli sprouts distributed to grocery stores, food co-ops, restaurants and food service customers in Idaho, Montana and Washington, medicaldaily.com reported. The product carried expiration dates of 9/7, 9/9, 9/11, 9/14 and 9/16.
The action followed a sample collected and analyzed by Montana officials that tested positive for Salmonella, according to medicaldaily.com. Two people have been hospitalized and no deaths have been reported, the outlet reported.
The remedy stated in the recall was not to eat the recalled broccoli sprouts and to throw them away or return them to the store, medicaldaily.com reported. The report was published on September 9, 2026.
Sep 10, 2026, 11:47 p.m. ETFirst report
Broccoli Sprouts Recalled in Three States Over Salmonella; Two Hospitalized
Evergreen Fresh Sprouts, LLC has recalled broccoli sprouts distributed to grocery stores, food co-ops, restaurants and food service customers in Idaho, Montana and Washington, according to medicaldaily.com. The recall was initiated on September 4, 2026, and reported on September 9, 2026.
The recall followed a sample collected and analyzed by Montana officials that tested positive for Salmonella, medicaldaily.com reported. The affected product carries expiration dates of 9/7, 9/9, 9/11, 9/14 and 9/16, according to the outlet.
Two people have been hospitalized and no deaths have been reported, medicaldaily.com reported. The CDC and the FDA are involved, the outlet said.
Consumers should not eat the recalled broccoli sprouts and should throw them away or return them to the store, according to medicaldaily.com. The situation is ongoing.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 111 Sept 2026, 04:14current
First published.
- Version 111 Sept 2026, 03:47current
First published.
- Version 111 Sept 2026, 03:52current
First published.
- Version 111 Sept 2026, 03:52current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.