CPSC Recalls BUSOHA Magnetic Fidget Slider Toys Over Magnet Ingestion Hazard

The Consumer Product Safety Commission announced a recall of about 2,186 magnetic fidget slider toys on August 6, 2026.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 19, 2026, 10:15 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 19, 2026, 10:23 p.m. ET

On August 6, 2026, the Consumer Product Safety Commission () published a recall notice (recall number ) for BUSOHA 6-pack Magnetic Fidget Slider Toys sold on Amazon. According to recall records, no injuries have been reported in connection with the recalled products. According to the recall notice, the fidget sliders violate the mandatory standard for toys because the silicone casing can be easily removed to expose loose magnets, posing an ingestion hazard to children. Ingested magnets can attract each other or other metal objects through the digestive system, which can cause intestinal perforations, blockage, twisting, blood poisoning, and death. The recall involves BUSOHA 6-pack Magnetic Fidget Slider Toys sold by . Each slider features a two-toned silicone casing with one side in blue and the opposite side in gray, black, purple, dark blue, white, or green, with each color having a different texture. The front packaging displays "MAGNETIC Fidget Slider Toys" with all six sliders visible through the box. The notice directs consumers to take the fidget sliders away from children, stop using them immediately, throw them away, and email a photo of the disposed toys to BUSHOHArecall@outlook.com to receive a full refund from BUSOHA. database records show no other enforcement actions involving this firm.

Earlier reports

Aug 19, 2026, 10:15 p.m. ETFirst report
BUSOHA Recalls Magnetic Fidget Sliders Over Ingestion Risk
On August 6, 2026, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued a recall notice for about 2,186 BUSOHA 6-pack Magnetic Fidget Slider Toys in a developing safety action. The products were sold on Amazon by Shenzhen Yuejia Mei Maoyi Youxian Gongsi (Shenzhen Yuejia Mei Trading Co., Ltd.), doing business as BUSOHA, of China.
According to the CPSC recall record (recall number 26664), the magnetic fidget sliders violate mandatory safety standards for toys because they can liberate loose magnets. Swallowed high-powered magnets can attract each other or other metal objects and become lodged in the digestive system, which can result in intestinal perforations, twisting, blockage, blood poisoning, and death. No injuries have been reported.
The recall involves BUSOHA 6-pack Magnetic Fidget Slider Toys. Each slider features a two-toned silicone casing that is blue on one side and gray, black, purple, dark blue, white, or green on the opposite side, with each color having a different texture. The silicone casing can be easily removed to expose the magnets. The front of the box displays "MAGNETIC Fidget Slider Toys" with all six sliders visible.
The CPSC states that consumers should immediately take the fidget sliders away from children, stop using them, and contact BUSOHA for a full refund. To receive the refund, consumers are instructed to throw away the fidget sliders and email a photo of the disposed toys to BUSHOHArecall@outlook.com. CPSC records list no other prior enforcement actions for this firm.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/Magnetic-Fidget-Sliders-Recalled-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death-from-Magnet-Ingestion-Violate-Mandatory-Standard-for-Toys-Sold-on-Amazon-by-BUSOHA

Revision history

Version 120 Aug 2026, 02:15current
First published.
Version 120 Aug 2026, 02:23current
First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.